Most AI reviewers read your diff. CodeGate investigates the repository around it — following imports, reading the code your change actually touches, and checking it against your project's own rules.
Your seniors review only what matters.
Free tier · 1 repo · 100 reviews/mo · No credit card
+ const apiKey = process.env.SENDGRID_API_KEY;+ const users = await db.user.findMany({
where: { id: { in: ids } },
});Four capabilities, working on the same codebase.
Four agents on every pull request.
Correctness, security, architecture and performance — each tuned to one job, not a generalist trying to do everything. Findings arrive as inline comments where the problem is, with an applicable fix when there is one.
It reads the repository, not just the diff.
When CodeGate connects to a project it explores the codebase itself — following imports, reading the files your change actually touches, deciding what to look at next. That is what lets it judge a change against your architecture instead of generic best practices.
Blocking that actually blocks.
High-confidence issues fail the commit status and hold the merge. Anything doubtful is an optional nitpick, never noise. Your team never learns to ignore CodeGate comments — which is how review tools die.
What your codebase looks like over time.
Repository-level health, not just per-PR verdicts: outstanding findings, vulnerable dependencies, and a printable report for the conversations that happen away from the terminal.
The details that decide whether a review tool survives its first month on a real team.
Correctness, security, architecture and performance — each one tuned to one job, not a generalist trying to do everything.
Commit a .codegate/config.yaml to your repo. Your team's CLAUDE.md, your standards, your thresholds — the agents review against them, not generic ones.
High-confidence issues block; anything doubtful is an optional nitpick, not spam. Your team never learns to ignore CodeGate comments. Always a status check; optionally block merges when you trust the agents.
Your team never gets a false "all clear." When in doubt on security, we flag it — we'd rather over-warn than let a risk slip through.
No more waiting on a review that never comes, or an empty "LGTM 👍". Consistent, immediate feedback your junior devs actually learn from.
We review the diff via the API. We never train on your code, and we never request write access.
Findings come as inline comments with applicable "suggestion" blocks. Your team clicks once to apply the fix.
Claude, GPT, Gemini — routed per axis for the best cost/quality balance. Override per repo if you want.
One click. We never request write access to your code.
One click, read-only access. No API keys, no workflow files, no changes to your CI.
Within 30–60 seconds, the four agents post inline comments with suggested fixes. That's it.
Drops in alongside your existing CI. It doesn't touch or reconfigure your pipeline — install the app and open a PR.
A bug in production costs your team hours, money, and sometimes reputation.
CodeGate catches it in the PR — where it costs minutes.
Start free. Upgrade only when your team grows.